Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
69 Imaging
44 Features
33 Overall
39
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 565g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed January 2006
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and ist DL2 (6MP) and the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and ist DL2 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-630 iHS was revealed 7 years after the ist DL2 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax ist DL2 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-630 iHS scores vs the ist DL2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Pentax ist DL2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Pentax ist DL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Pentax ist DL2
| TG-630 iHS | ist DL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2006 | Newer by 85 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 210k | Clearer display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax ist DL2 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| ist DL2 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Pentax ist DL2
| TG-630 iHS | ist DL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS comes with outer measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Pentax ist DL2 has measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 565 grams (1.25 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-630 iHS vs the ist DL2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-630 iHS and ist DL2 is 94 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and ist DL2.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-630 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will show more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The more modern TG-630 iHS should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Pentax ist DL2 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Pentax ist DL2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Pentax ist DL2 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2006-01-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 5 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) | 565 grams (1.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 639 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | - |