Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The TG-630 iHS was announced 3 years after the CX2 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-630 iHS matches up vs the CX2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Ricoh CX2
TG-630 iHS | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 42 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
CX2 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh CX2
TG-630 iHS | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS provides physical dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-630 iHS compared to the CX2.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and CX2 is 94 and 93 respectively.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-630 iHS and CX2.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-630 iHS to offer you extra detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher TG-630 iHS provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Ricoh CX2 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) | 185 grams (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $200 | $341 |