Clicky

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Olympus TG-630 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly similar but the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TG-630 iHS was released 2 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-630 iHS matches up vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 TG-630 iHS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
LaunchedJanuary 2013March 2010More modern by 35 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-630 iHS

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TG-630 iHS 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 TG-630 iHS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS features exterior dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Compare the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-630 iHS against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-630 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-630 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer TG-630 iHS will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
27
comes with face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
36
manual focus
exports RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography highlights
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lighter than average (355 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography highlights
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
59
environment sealing
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
not so great battery pack (220 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
60
lighter than average (355g)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS Landscape photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography details
39
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
not so great battery pack (220 per charge)
missing Time Lapse function
47
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
33
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing mic support
28
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (355g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus TG-630 iHSRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus TG-630 iHS Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2013-01-08 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 167 gr (0.37 pounds) 355 gr (0.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 pictures 410 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $200 $349