Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-630 iHS was brought out 13 months before the WG-4 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-630 iHS matches up versus the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4
| TG-630 iHS | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| WG-4 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh WG-4
| TG-630 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has got external measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the TG-630 iHS versus the WG-4.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-630 iHS and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-630 iHS and WG-4.
As you can see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-630 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $330 |
