Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Updated by Ricoh WG-80
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh WG-70, both Waterproof digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-630 iHS was announced 8 years earlier than the WG-70 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-630 iHS matches up versus the WG-70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Ricoh WG-70
| TG-630 iHS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| WG-70 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 | January 2013 | Newer by 86 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh WG-70
| TG-630 iHS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS offers physical dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-630 iHS vs the WG-70.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and WG-70 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The picture below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-630 iHS and WG-70.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TG-630 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $200 | $280 |