Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB550
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is very comparable and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-630 iHS was unveiled 3 years later than the HZ15W and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TG-630 iHS matches up versus the HZ15W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung HZ15W. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung HZ15W
| TG-630 iHS | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| HZ15W | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung HZ15W
| TG-630 iHS | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS offers physical measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-630 iHS and the HZ15W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-630 iHS and HZ15W is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-630 iHS and HZ15W.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of files although you really should take the release date of the cameras into account. The younger TG-630 iHS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also called | - | WB550 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167g (0.37 lb) | 249g (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $200 | $330 |