Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Other Name is WB5000
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-630 iHS was launched 2 years later than the HZ25W and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the TG-630 iHS grades against the HZ25W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung HZ25W
| TG-630 iHS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| HZ25W | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung HZ25W
| TG-630 iHS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS offers physical measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-630 iHS and the HZ25W.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-630 iHS and HZ25W is 94 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-630 iHS and HZ25W.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures though you need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent TG-630 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB5000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | 428 gr (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $200 | $350 |