Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung SL30
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is ES15
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Samsung SL30, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the SL30 (10MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-630 iHS was revealed 3 years after the SL30 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-630 iHS scores vs the SL30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Samsung SL30. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung SL30
| TG-630 iHS | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SL30 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung SL30
| TG-630 iHS | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS offers outside dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL30 has specifications of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Samsung SL30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-630 iHS vs the SL30.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and SL30 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-630 iHS and SL30.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-630 iHS to offer greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent TG-630 iHS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung SL30 |
| Also called as | - | ES15 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167g (0.37 lb) | 140g (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $93 |