Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung WB35F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-630 iHS was unveiled 12 months earlier than the WB35F and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-630 iHS scores versus the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung WB35F
| TG-630 iHS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| WB35F | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 12 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung WB35F
| TG-630 iHS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS provides outside measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the TG-630 iHS and the WB35F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-630 iHS and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-630 iHS and WB35F.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB35F to provide more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-630 iHS will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $130 |