Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony S2000
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony S2000 Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Sony S2000, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe TG-630 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the S2000 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-630 iHS grades against the S2000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Sony S2000
| TG-630 iHS | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 37 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| S2000 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Sony S2000
| TG-630 iHS | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has outside measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Sony S2000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-630 iHS against the S2000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and S2000 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and S2000.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-630 iHS to give extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer TG-630 iHS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $225 |
