Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus XZ-1
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-810 versus Olympus XZ-1, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the TG-810 (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the TG-810 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-810 was revealed 7 months after the XZ-1 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-810 grades versus the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-810 and Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-810 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus XZ-1
TG-810 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | January 2011 | More modern by 7 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Crisper display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-810
XZ-1 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Olympus XZ-1
TG-810 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-810 provides outside dimensions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-810 versus Olympus XZ-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-810 vs the XZ-1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-810 and XZ-1 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at specifications. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-810 and XZ-1.
Plainly, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-810 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-810 will give extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger TG-810 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus TG-810 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus TG-810 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-08-16 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 320 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $428 | $567 |