Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic FS42
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-810 and Panasonic FS42, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the TG-810 (14MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the TG-810 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-810 was released 2 years later than the FS42 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-810 scores vs the FS42 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-810 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-810 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Panasonic FS42
| TG-810 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | April 2009 | Fresher by 29 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus TG-810
| FS42 | TG-810 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Panasonic FS42
| TG-810 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-810 enjoys external measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-810 and Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-810 vs the FS42.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-810 and FS42 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-810 and FS42.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-810 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-810 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The newer TG-810 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
| Olympus TG-810 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-810 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-08-16 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 lb) | 132g (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $428 | $580 |