Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35
Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
Olympus TG-810
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS40
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-810 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-810 was released 3 years before the ZS35 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-810 grades against the ZS35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-810 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-810 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Panasonic ZS35
| TG-810 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus TG-810
| ZS35 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 29 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Panasonic ZS35
| TG-810 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-810 has physical measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-810 and the ZS35.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-810 and ZS35 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-810 and ZS35.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Panasonic ZS35 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older TG-810 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-810 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Portrait photography camera
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has face detect focus
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-810 Street photography features
Panasonic ZS35 Street photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (305g)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Olympus TG-810 Sports photography advice
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography advice
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (220 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-810
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS35
environment proofing
good MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery (220 shots)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
lighter than average in class (305g)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (480mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-810 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography factors
fairly wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
environment proofing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery (220 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-810 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (305 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Olympus TG-810 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-810 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-08-16 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 305g (0.67 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $428 | $300 |