Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f26/a0f260975b7fd3cfd965df18bc5d1244f1cf70fb" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2015
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS45
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-810 (14MP) and the ZS50 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-810 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the ZS50 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TG-810 scores vs the ZS50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-810 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-810 Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Panasonic ZS50
TG-810 | ZS50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus TG-810
ZS50 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2015 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 41 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Panasonic ZS50
TG-810 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-810 features outer measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS50 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-810 versus the ZS50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76d4b/76d4b7a8377816dd09491d634b5ea25980eda7f5" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-810 and ZS50 is 92 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccc1f/ccc1f702003cf0d9ca83b78104fc9329f50d68cd" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The visual here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-810 and ZS50.
Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-810 to give extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-810 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f6b2/9f6b29d6dce6cdd1e974a3c712ab52cae798310c" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91092/91092721d7205e2438803fe87bd20969ef1b3114" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus TG-810 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-810 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-08-16 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lbs) | 243 grams (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 300 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $428 | $350 |