Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37


69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012

Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus TG-810 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-810 (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is relatively similar but the TG-810 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.

The TG-810 was brought out 5 months prior to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-810 matches up against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-810 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-810 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
TG-810 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus TG-810
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
TG-810 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2012 | Similar generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-810 has got outer measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-810 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-810 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-810 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 92 and 69 respectively.

Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-810 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-810 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will offer more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively.

Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus TG-810 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-810 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-08-16 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 550g (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 400 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $428 | $871 |