Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Olympus VR-340, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-820 iHS was released very close to the VR-340 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the VR-340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus VR-340
TG-820 iHS | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 460k | Sharper display (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
VR-340 | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus VR-340
TG-820 iHS | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | January 2012 | Similar generation | |
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the VR-340.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and VR-340 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The image here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and VR-340.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VR-340 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,030k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $500 | $130 |