Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Launched February 2012
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Olympus VR-340, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The TG-820 iHS was released very close to the VR-340 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the VR-340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus VR-340

 TG-820 iHS VR-340 
Display resolution1030k460kSharper display (+570k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 VR-340 TG-820 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus VR-340

 TG-820 iHS VR-340 
RevealedFebruary 2012January 2012Similar generation
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the VR-340.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and VR-340 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The image here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and VR-340.

To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography factors
27
comes with face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
34
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography details
Olympus VR-340 Street photography details
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography info
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography info
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max fps low (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (220 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography highlights
59
environment sealing
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
terrible battery (220 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
69
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Landscape photography camera
38
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
terrible battery (220 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
43
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Vlogging with Olympus VR-340
33
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone jack
33
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (125g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus VR-340
 Olympus TG-820 iHSOlympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus TG-820 iHS Olympus VR-340
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-02-08 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,030k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206g (0.45 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-50B LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $500 $130