Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus XZ-1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is pretty similar but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was brought out 13 months after the XZ-1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the XZ-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus XZ-1
TG-820 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 13 months |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+416k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
XZ-1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus XZ-1
TG-820 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus XZ-1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ccef/6ccefd879afd628a216a3a138b16007aa1c947ec" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and XZ-1 is 92 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/297e0/297e058caca5dfb41f84fe1f1e654affdf40c8f6" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The pic below should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and XZ-1.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will deliver more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer TG-820 iHS should have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c991/9c9910a26ee41ee446d1d941b4c61d32735d97bb" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d017/9d0178e89fdba26978d4fe7dbe06f41c448aaa40" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 320 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $500 | $567 |