Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 10 months before the XZ-2 iHS so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-820 iHS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| XZ-2 iHS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 10 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-820 iHS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same megapixels but different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS has got the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh harder. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography highlights
offers face detect focusing
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
manual focus
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low MP (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
heavier than average in class (346 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (220 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
good battery life (340 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
environment proofing
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
bad battery (220 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
good battery life (340 shots)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (346 grams)
low MP (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
relatively wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery (220 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
missing Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic port
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have mic socket
display isn't selfie friendly
heavier than average in class (346g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,030k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 340 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $500 | $450 |