Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic S1R
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
54 Imaging
79 Features
84 Overall
81
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic S1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1020g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Introduced February 2019
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic S1R Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Panasonic S1R, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and S1R (47MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and S1R (Full frame) have different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was released 8 years prior to the S1R and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic S1R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the S1R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic S1R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic S1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic S1R
TG-820 iHS | S1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1R over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
S1R | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2019 | February 2012 | Fresher by 85 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 2100k | 1030k | Clearer screen (+1070k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic S1R
TG-820 iHS | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic S1R Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Panasonic S1R has measurements of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") with a weight of 1020 grams (2.25 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Panasonic S1R in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the S1R.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and S1R is 92 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic S1R Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The graphic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and S1R.
Plainly, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Panasonic S1R will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 35MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic S1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic S1R Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R |
Type | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2019-02-01 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 47MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 8000 x 6000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 30 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 2,100 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 1020 grams (2.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3525 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 360 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | Two |
Cost at launch | $500 | $3,698 |