Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Released November 2011
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Panasonic 3D1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was unveiled 4 months after the 3D1 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up versus the 3D1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic 3D1
TG-820 iHS | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 460k | Crisper display (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
3D1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic 3D1
TG-820 iHS | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | November 2011 | Same age | |
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Panasonic 3D1 has proportions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Panasonic 3D1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the 3D1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and 3D1 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and 3D1.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you should really factor the launch date of the cameras into account.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2011-11-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 200 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $670 |