Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
95 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Panasonic FS25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-820 iHS was announced 3 years after the FS25 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the FS25 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic FS25
| TG-820 iHS | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FS25 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FS25
| TG-820 iHS | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the FS25.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and FS25 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The image here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and FS25.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of images but you really should factor the age of the cameras into account. The fresher TG-820 iHS provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FS25 as a Portrait photography camera
features face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
includes face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography features
Panasonic FS25 Street photography features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FS25 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FS25 Travel photography highlights
environment sealing
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FS25 Landscape photography advice
really wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging information
Panasonic FS25 Vlogging information
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic support
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2009-01-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,030 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 148 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $500 | $230 |
