Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7a1/8a7a180937ea0d2aac292604a641c6ce9f80a13b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FX48, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the FX48 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the FX48 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-820 iHS scores versus the FX48 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic FX48
TG-820 iHS | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
FX48 | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FX48
TG-820 iHS | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Panasonic FX48 has measurements of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FX48 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the FX48.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff570/ff570c990ecd0a9e4e6b4394ae3f2505a31d693c" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and FX48 is 92 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/912b5/912b5278a7f0c637cda697470d21226fef5619c7" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and FX48.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos although you should consider the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher TG-820 iHS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a828a/a828a81fc725ea14c1ed1bc777978927e660b55c" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf6de/cf6de34a878ddb4dda9f8d988f4fdaf275793235" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $500 | $325 |