Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 21 months after the FX75 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the FX75 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic FX75
| TG-820 iHS | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 21 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FX75 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FX75
| TG-820 iHS | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the FX75.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and FX75 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and FX75.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Panasonic FX75 to render more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger TG-820 iHS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $139 |