Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Launched June 2014
- Refreshed by Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 3 years earlier than the FZ1000 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the FZ1000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic FZ1000
TG-820 iHS | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 921k | Clearer screen (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
FZ1000 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2014 | February 2012 | More modern by 28 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FZ1000
TG-820 iHS | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys exterior dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ1000 has sizing of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the FZ1000.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and FZ1000 is 92 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and FZ1000.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Panasonic FZ1000 will deliver greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 831 gr (1.83 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $500 | $800 |