Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ28
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
72 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ28 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 417g - 118 x 75 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ28 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FZ28, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the FZ28 (10MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-820 iHS was launched 3 years after the FZ28 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the FZ28 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ28 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ28 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic FZ28
| TG-820 iHS | FZ28 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 38 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ28 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FZ28 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FZ28
| TG-820 iHS | FZ28 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ28 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ28 has sizing of 118mm x 75mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 417 grams (0.92 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FZ28 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the FZ28.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and FZ28 is 92 and 72 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ28 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specs. The pic here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and FZ28.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-820 iHS to give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent TG-820 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ28 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ28 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.50 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye Auto, On, Red-Eye On, Red-Eye Slow Sync, Off, Slow Sync (1&2) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps, 848 x 480, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 @ 30fps, 320 x 240 @ 10fps |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 417 gr (0.92 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 118 x 75 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 27 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 17.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 79 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $599 |