Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic LX100
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
83 Imaging
51 Features
73 Overall
59
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic LX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 393g - 115 x 66 x 55mm
- Released September 2014
- Later Model is Panasonic LX100 II
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic LX100 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Panasonic LX100, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the LX100 (13MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and LX100 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-820 iHS was unveiled 3 years prior to the LX100 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic LX100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the LX100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic LX100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic LX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic LX100
TG-820 iHS | LX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 921k | Clearer screen (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX100 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
LX100 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | February 2012 | More recent by 31 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic LX100
TG-820 iHS | LX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic LX100 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Panasonic LX100 has sizing of 115mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 2.2") with a weight of 393 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Panasonic LX100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the LX100.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and LX100 is 92 and 83 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic LX100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and LX100.
Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic LX100 will provide greater detail having an extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic LX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic LX100 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2014-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4112 x 3088 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-75mm (3.1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.7-2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,764 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 393g (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 115 x 66 x 55mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 300 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $500 | $800 |