Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS100
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Launched January 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ100
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS200
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS100 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZS100, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and ZS100 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and ZS100 (1") possess different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 4 years before the ZS100 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the ZS100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic ZS100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic ZS100
TG-820 iHS | ZS100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS100 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
ZS100 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | February 2012 | Newer by 47 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1040k | 1030k | Clearer display (+10k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZS100
TG-820 iHS | ZS100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS100 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS100 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 312 grams (0.69 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZS100 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the ZS100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and ZS100 is 92 and 87 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The picture here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and ZS100.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Panasonic ZS100 will give greater detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS100 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ100 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2016-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 9.9 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 312g (0.69 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 559 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 300 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $500 | $700 |