Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax 645Z
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Announced April 2014
- Superseded the Pentax 645D
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax 645Z Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax 645Z, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Pro DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and 645Z (51MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and 645Z (Medium format) have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 3 years prior to the 645Z which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the 645Z in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax 645Z Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax 645Z. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Pentax 645Z Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax 645Z
TG-820 iHS | 645Z |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
645Z | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2014 | February 2012 | Newer by 26 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 1030k | Clearer display (+7k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax 645Z
TG-820 iHS | 645Z | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax 645Z Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Pentax 645Z has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") along with a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax 645Z in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the 645Z.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and 645Z is 92 and 49 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax 645Z Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and 645Z.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Pentax 645Z will offer you greater detail using its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax 645Z Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax 645Z | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax 645Z |
Type | Waterproof | Pro DSLR |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2014-04-15 |
Body design | Compact | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | PRIME III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 8256 x 6192 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 27 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax 645AF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 6 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3.2" |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/125 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 1550 grams (3.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 101 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 650 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $5,024 |