Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Released June 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the Efina (14MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 16 months prior to the Efina which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the Efina in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Pentax Efina. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax Efina
| TG-820 iHS | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Efina | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 16 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax Efina
| TG-820 iHS | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Pentax Efina has dimensions of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the Efina.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and Efina is 92 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and Efina.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Pentax Efina to give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax Efina Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax Efina | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax Efina |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2013-06-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,030k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 91 grams (0.20 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 200 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI109 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $10 |
