Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-1
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
55 Imaging
76 Features
82 Overall
78
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Announced February 2016
- Refreshed by Pentax K-1 II
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and K-1 (36MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and K-1 (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was revealed 5 years prior to the K-1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the K-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Pentax K-1. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Pentax K-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax K-1
TG-820 iHS | K-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
K-1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | February 2012 | More modern by 49 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 1030k | Crisper screen (+7k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-1
TG-820 iHS | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-1 has specifications of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the K-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and K-1 is 92 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and K-1.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Pentax K-1 will render greater detail because of its extra 24 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-1 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2016-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 36 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7360 x 4912 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,030k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.4 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 1010 grams (2.23 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 96 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3280 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 760 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | One | Two |
Launch cost | $500 | $1,499 |