Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
63 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Older Model is Pentax K-30
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and K-50 (16MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and K-50 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-820 iHS was released 21 months before the K-50 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-50 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the K-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-50. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Pentax K-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax K-50
TG-820 iHS | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 921k | Sharper display (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-50 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
K-50 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 21 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-50
TG-820 iHS | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides external measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-50 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the K-50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and K-50 is 92 and 63 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and K-50.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-50 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-50 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-50 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 51600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 650 gr (1.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1120 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 410 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $500 | $610 |