Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-70
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35


62 Imaging
67 Features
81 Overall
72
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 688g - 126 x 93 x 74mm
- Released June 2016
- Renewed by Pentax KF

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-70 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax K-70, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and K-70 (24MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and K-70 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.

The TG-820 iHS was revealed 5 years prior to the K-70 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-70 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the K-70 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-70. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Pentax K-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax K-70
TG-820 iHS | K-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-70 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
K-70 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2016 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 52 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-70
TG-820 iHS | K-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-70 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Pentax K-70 has proportions of 126mm x 93mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 688 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax K-70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the K-70.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and K-70 is 92 and 62 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The graphic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and K-70.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Pentax K-70 will give greater detail because of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-70 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-70 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2016-06-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,030k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.63x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 688 grams (1.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 126 x 93 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 410 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $500 | $649 |