Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S1
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
69 Imaging
63 Features
70 Overall
65
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 558g - 121 x 93 x 70mm
- Announced August 2014
- Newer Model is Pentax K-S2
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S1 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax K-S1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and K-S1 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and K-S1 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-820 iHS was released 3 years before the K-S1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-S1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the K-S1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Pentax K-S1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Pentax K-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax K-S1
TG-820 iHS | K-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 921k | Crisper screen (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
K-S1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 31 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-S1
TG-820 iHS | K-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS offers outer dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-S1 has specifications of 121mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 558 grams (1.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax K-S1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the K-S1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and K-S1 is 92 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and K-S1.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Pentax K-S1 will show more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S1 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-S1 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2014-08-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Prime MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 5.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto + redeye, on, on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 558 gr (1.23 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 121 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1061 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 410 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $339 |