Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S2
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
64 Imaging
63 Features
82 Overall
70
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Released February 2015
- Previous Model is Pentax K-S1
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax K-S2, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and K-S2 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and K-S2 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was announced 4 years before the K-S2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the K-S2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Pentax K-S2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax K-S2
| TG-820 iHS | K-S2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k | 921k | Crisper screen (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| K-S2 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | February 2012 | Newer by 36 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax K-S2
| TG-820 iHS | K-S2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Pentax K-S2 has dimensions of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") having a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax K-S2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the K-S2.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and K-S2 is 92 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The pic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and K-S2.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Pentax K-S2 will produce more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-S2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax K-S2 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2012-02-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | PRIME MII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,030k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.4 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 678 gr (1.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | 410 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI109 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $581 |