Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax MX-1
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Pentax MX-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax MX-1, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 16 months earlier than the MX-1 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the MX-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax MX-1
| TG-820 iHS | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| MX-1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 16 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax MX-1
| TG-820 iHS | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Pentax MX-1 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax MX-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the MX-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and MX-1 is 92 and 84 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and MX-1.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact MP but different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS provides the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF harder. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Pentax MX-1 as a Portrait photography camera
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
focusing manually
supports face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography highlights
Pentax MX-1 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors (391g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography features
Pentax MX-1 Sports photography features
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max fps very slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (220 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
great battery pack (290 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Travel photography with Pentax MX-1
environment sealing
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
bad battery life (220 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
great battery pack (290 per charge)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (391 grams)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography info
Pentax MX-1 Landscape photography info
decently wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
bad battery life (220 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
focusing manually
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (290 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
missing Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Vlogging with Pentax MX-1
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no external microphone support
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
missing microphone support
more heavy than competitors (391g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax MX-1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2013-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 391 grams (0.86 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 290 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $400 |