Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax P70
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35


95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax P70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 155g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched March 2009

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax P70 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax P70, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the P70 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

The TG-820 iHS was launched 2 years later than the P70 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax P70 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the P70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax P70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax Optio P70. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Pentax P70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Pentax P70
TG-820 iHS | P70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax P70 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
P70 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Pentax P70
TG-820 iHS | P70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax P70 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Pentax P70 has sizing of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Pentax P70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the P70.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and P70 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax P70 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and P70.
As you can see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you have to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more modern TG-820 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax P70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Pentax P70 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax Optio P70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pentax Optio P70 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2009-03-02 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,030k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $500 | $200 |