Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 2 years after the CX2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-820 iHS scores vs the CX2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh CX2
| TG-820 iHS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| CX2 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh CX2
| TG-820 iHS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the CX2.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and CX2 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The image here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and CX2.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-820 iHS to resolve greater detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher TG-820 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh CX2 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,030 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $500 | $341 |