Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Introduced September 2010
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-820 iHS was brought out 17 months later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
TG-820 iHS | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | September 2010 | More recent by 17 months | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 920k | Clearer display (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
TG-820 iHS | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has proportions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS includes the tinier sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field more challenging. The younger TG-820 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 140 grams (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 320 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $566 |