Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
37
Overall
46

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Launched February 2012
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Introduced September 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The TG-820 iHS was brought out 17 months later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 TG-820 iHS GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
IntroducedFebruary 2012September 2010More recent by 17 months
Display resolution1030k920kClearer display (+110k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 TG-820 iHS 
Manually focus More precise focusing

Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 TG-820 iHS GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has proportions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 92 and 88 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS includes the tinier sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field more challenging. The younger TG-820 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Portrait photography advice
27
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
58
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (12MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Street photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
70
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (140 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography information
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sports photography information
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
low fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (220 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
32
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery life (320 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Travel photography factors
59
weather sealing
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
bad battery power (220 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
59
lighter than competitors in class (140 grams)
flash built-in
not so great battery life (320 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Landscape photography camera
38
relatively wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery power (220 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse function
48
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3")
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery life (320 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging information
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Vlogging information
33
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone port
28
offers face detection focus
lighter than competitors in class (140g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
 Olympus TG-820 iHSRicoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus TG-820 iHS Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2012-02-08 2010-09-21
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VI GR Engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/2.5
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,030 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 180s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/3200s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lb) 140 grams (0.31 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photos 320 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $500 $566