Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is relatively similar but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-820 iHS was released 7 months after the GXR Mount A12 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the GXR Mount A12 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
TG-820 iHS | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | August 2011 | More modern by 7 months | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 920k | Crisper screen (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
GXR Mount A12 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
TG-820 iHS | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has proportions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the GXR Mount A12.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and GXR Mount A12 is 92 and 84 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and GXR Mount A12.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS has the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field harder. The fresher TG-820 iHS will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2011-08-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,030k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/9000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 9.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 330 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $500 | $349 |