Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was announced 24 months prior to the WG-4 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4
| TG-820 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WG-4 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-4
| TG-820 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has outer dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the WG-4.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and WG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The photograph here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and WG-4.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 to resolve more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography advice
features face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography details
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
weather proof
low fps (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (240 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography advice
weather proof
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
bad battery power (240 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography advice
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
missing Timelapse recording
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery power (240 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging advice
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging advice
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone socket
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-02-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 240 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $500 | $330 |