Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The TG-820 iHS was released 6 years prior to the WG-50 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS matches up versus the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh WG-50
TG-820 iHS | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
WG-50 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 64 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-50
TG-820 iHS | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features external measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the WG-50.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and WG-50 is 92 and 91 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and WG-50.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 300 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $280 |