Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was released 6 years prior to the WG-50 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS matches up versus the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh WG-50
TG-820 iHS | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 230k | Sharper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
WG-50 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | February 2012 | More modern by 64 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-50
TG-820 iHS | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features external measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the WG-50.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and WG-50 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and WG-50.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 300 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $280 |