Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 3 years prior to the WG-M1 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TG-820 iHS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+915k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WG-M1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 31 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1
| TG-820 iHS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the WG-M1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and WG-M1.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,030k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $500 | $2,000 |
