Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f21bb/f21bbba72691e81aa737426aec1e12ce3349a5bb" alt="Samsung DV300F front Samsung DV300F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung DV300F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and DV300F (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was manufactured 2 months later than the DV300F and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-820 iHS scores versus the DV300F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung DV300F. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung DV300F
TG-820 iHS | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
DV300F | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung DV300F
TG-820 iHS | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Similar generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung DV300F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the DV300F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e29e/1e29e182ec208bf30cb1fbf2cdb7beb0220c962e" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and DV300F is 92 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08043/080438f2d68f8f26d1b68425ed9d334523d99ef6" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and DV300F.
As you can see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung DV300F to give you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8afc/b8afc76dab873cd4042066b1e2e8f4fc241bb4a0" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dfc9/1dfc91faf98ae8e61c901c642ca69823433af54f" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung DV300F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung DV300F |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2012-01-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,030k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | BP88 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $200 |