Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung EX2F
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung EX2F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is relatively close but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was announced 10 months earlier than the EX2F so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the EX2F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung EX2F
TG-820 iHS | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 0k | Crisper screen (+1030k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
EX2F | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | February 2012 | Fresher by 10 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung EX2F
TG-820 iHS | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has proportions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the EX2F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and EX2F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The graphic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and EX2F.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS contains the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field tougher. The older TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-02-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,030k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 294g (0.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $500 | $478 |