Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was introduced 6 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS scores versus the GX-1S with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung GX-1S
TG-820 iHS | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2006 | More recent by 74 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper display (+820k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
GX-1S | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung GX-1S
TG-820 iHS | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the GX-1S.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/880a6/880a64804c1a28c6bf779b21fec8bcbf99ea2e20" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and GX-1S is 92 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7907/e79074c6fcd97e6e1733b47e053a55d64202ce6b" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and GX-1S.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will render extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer TG-820 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48e3f/48e3f73fb075b8067b4198311137ac0256ccd2e1" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0059/d0059d0300d5e5bd871d97540707a5caf6d424a0" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung GX-1S |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 605 gr (1.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $850 |