Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47851/478511a8a927c87f7bc64622b7ea2ec44bf09c1b" alt="Samsung HZ15W front Samsung HZ15W front"
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as WB550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ15W, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was launched 3 years after the HZ15W which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the HZ15W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung HZ15W
TG-820 iHS | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
HZ15W | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ15W
TG-820 iHS | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung HZ15W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ15W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the HZ15W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d9bc/1d9bc462519db01eda8ec318d61981ae3aab077a" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and HZ15W is 92 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9137a/9137a7e0ca0b0c3d774f89f2c05e8c89cc334de5" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and HZ15W.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of files though you should really factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-820 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0223/e0223ab6267ff9665b08972eec2ef9bb1b09fd8a" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd94/cfd94f5f63ef1418ee69151a09eaeb0ec3fdbb16" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung HZ15W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB550 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $500 | $330 |