Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-820 iHS was unveiled 20 months after the HZ25W which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung HZ25W. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung HZ25W
| TG-820 iHS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 20 months |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| HZ25W | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ25W
| TG-820 iHS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the HZ25W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and HZ25W is 92 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The pic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and HZ25W.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of files although you will want to take the age of the products into consideration. The more recent TG-820 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Portrait photography camera
has face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
manual focus
delivers RAW formats
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography features
Samsung HZ25W Street photography features
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography highlights
Samsung HZ25W Sports photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
environment proofing
max fps low (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery (220 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography highlights
Samsung HZ25W Travel photography highlights
environment proofing
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
not so great battery (220 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
long reach (624mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ25W
rather wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
not so great battery (220 per charge)
does not have Timelapse function
manual focus
pretty wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging advice
Samsung HZ25W Vlogging advice
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone support
pretty wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called as | - | WB5000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 428 grams (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $500 | $350 |
