Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is WB600
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung HZ30W, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the HZ30W (12MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 2 years later than the HZ30W and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the HZ30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ30W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung HZ30W
| TG-820 iHS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| HZ30W | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ30W
| TG-820 iHS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides exterior dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung HZ30W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the HZ30W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and HZ30W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The photograph below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and HZ30W.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you should expect comparable quality of files however you need to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-820 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB600 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2010-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $280 |
