Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX11
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35


80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Released December 2010
- Superseded the Samsung NX10
- Later Model is Samsung NX20

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX11, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is fairly close but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and NX11 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.

The TG-820 iHS was announced 14 months later than the NX11 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the NX11 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX11. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung NX11
TG-820 iHS | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | December 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper display (+416k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
NX11 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX11
TG-820 iHS | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features exterior dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung NX11 has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") with a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX11 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the NX11.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and NX11 is 92 and 80 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The visual here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and NX11.
All in all, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung NX11 will result in more detail with its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher TG-820 iHS should have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX11 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-02-08 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 11.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 499g (1.10 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 400 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $500 | $626 |