Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Succeeded the Samsung NX1100
- Replacement is Samsung NX3000
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 22 months before the NX2000 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the NX2000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX2000. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung NX2000
TG-820 iHS | NX2000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
NX2000 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 22 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 1030k | Crisper screen (+122k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX2000
TG-820 iHS | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung NX2000 has dimensions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the NX2000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and NX2000 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and NX2000.
All in all, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung NX2000 will render more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 228 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $500 | $599 |